A seemingly minor translational difference would cause a revolution

Creation and Salvation are deeply feminine and masculine.  Our scriptures tell us so, but we have blotted this out in our translations.  Let’s start a simple revolution, namely to translate the bible using the gendered language of the bible!

Here is an example from today’s reading in the Liturgy of the Hours.

Romans 8:18-21

18 The sufferings of the present are as nothing compared with the glory to be revealed in us. 19 Indeed, the whole created world eagerly awaits the revelation of the sons of God. 20 Creation was made subject to futility, not of its own accord but by him who once subjected it; yet not without hope, 21 because the world itself will be freed from its slavery to corruption and share in the glorious freedom of the children of God.

Here is the Greek text, or at least one major version of it.

18 Λογίζομαι γὰρ ὅτι οὐκ ἄξια τὰ παθήματα τοῦ νῦν καιροῦ πρὸς τὴν μέλλουσαν δόξαν ἀποκαλυφθῆναι εἰς ἡμᾶς.  19 ἡ γὰρ ἀποκαραδοκία τῆς κτίσεως τὴν ἀποκάλυψιν τῶν υἱῶν τοῦ θεοῦ ἀπεκδέχεται·  20 τῇ γὰρ ματαιότητι ἡ κτίσις ὑπετάγη, οὐχ ἑκοῦσα ἀλλὰ διὰ τὸν ὑποτάξαντα, ἐφʼ ἑλπίδι  21 ὅτι καὶ αὐτὴ ἡ κτίσις ἐλευθερωθήσεται ἀπὸ τῆς δουλείας τῆς φθορᾶς εἰς τὴν ἐλευθερίαν τῆς δόξης τῶν τέκνων τοῦ θεοῦ.

Now let us take the same translation, but replace or insert the gendered terms (in brackets) found in the Greek text.

18 The sufferings of the present are as nothing compared with the glory to be revealed in us. 19 Indeed, the whole created world, [she] eagerly awaits the revelation of the sons of God. 20 Creation, [she] was made subject to futility, not of its [her] own accord but by him who once subjected it; yet not without hope, 21 because the world itself [herself] will be freed from its [her] slavery to corruption and share in the [her] glorious freedom of the children of God.

Notice that “created” is feminine, “revelation” is feminine, “creation” is feminine, “hope” is feminine, “world” and “creation” are the same word in Greek hence both feminine, “slavery” is feminine, “corruption” is feminine, and “freedom” is feminine.  Now, one could translate the gender character of the language in a variety of fashions, but my point here is to draw your attention to how gendered the language is, even in Greek which tends to be less gendered than Hebrew (at least from my observations – perhaps someone could correct me?)

Reflect for a moment on the significance of this seemingly small change in translations.  For those who deeply love man and woman, male and female, masculinity and femininity when that love and appreciation is genuine and not deformed, the Revelatory side of these passages breaks forth and one is reminded of how God’s Revelation comes through men and women (husbands and wives, mothers and fathers) down through history.  One becomes more attuned to the deeply mysterious way that all things come to be including in that masculine and feminine dimension of all created acts and all salvific acts.

It was no accident that the gender dimension of language was removed decades ago from most of scripture. And this is not unconnected with the fact that wide-spread gender confusion and even hatred for gender exists today. 

I beg any one with ears to hear to begin calling and even demanding a simple change in all modern translations.  Include the original gender dimension of words and passages wherever that language is found in Greek, Hebrew, or Latin (especially when it is found in all three languages).  And for those who knew better decades ago, you should be ashamed.

Light and Darkness

In the first day, the light and the darkness were separated.  Think about darkness for a moment.  In this world, it seems to be far greater than any light.  The light cannot conquer it.  With all the stars and even galaxies, the darkness surrounding them seems endless in comparison. This points to the way that the finality of the universe, the energy of the universe that moves what Bernard Lonergan calls emergent probability to its increasing act and intelligibility is surrounded by a greater entropy that will destroy all act and all intelligibility.  As one hears sometimes, evil seems to be more widespread than goodness, and the goodness will never overcome it.  The darkness will not be overcome. And the layout of our physical world communicates this to us.  But the world is not without hope. Nothing in that darkness can stop the light from shining.  A sun or another star can be seen through the darkness.  The light penetrates the darkness.  And it can then illuminate the world.  And beyond all of this, there is a light we do not see. 

Genesis 1:6-8: The Second Day

“And God said, ‘Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.’ And God made the firmament and separated the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament. And it was so. And God call the firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.”

Considerations

  1. In Hebrew, firmament is a solid expanse that is masculine.  It is interesting that Latin and Greek think of the firmament as a neuter object that separates the waters as a kind of dome. Hebrew relates the word to a hammering out of a metal — hence a giving of a shape to something, and this is the reason it is masculine. It makes boundaries and order.
  2. As for water, it is feminine in Latin, neuter in Greek, and masculine here in Hebrew.  I would need to see how these words are used to see if there is a shift in meaning that thus links them more to the feminine or masculine.  Eg. if Hebrew sees water in terms of cleansing from evil or just washing, maybe this is linked to something that the male would do for a ritual purification, hence the water rids the unwanted and protects one from that unwanted.  Perhaps in Latin, it is feminine as being linked with washing something to clean it up and make it more attractive and fertile.
  3. Heaven in both Greek and Hebrew is masculine, though it seems to be neuter in Latin.  Earth is feminine in contrast. We are closest to her, and life springs up from within her as a woman bears life from within her, hence earth is more feminine, motherly.  Heaven has the lights of the sky that guide us, and give us direction, hence are expressed as masculine.
  4. The deep in turn is like the unformed feminine. In contrast to earth, earth is the formed feminine.  We come from the earth. Men specifically are formed from the earth, and the woman later is made from the man.  And because God breathed life into the man, he is also from heaven.
  5. In “seeing” the male and female in the world, these two become channels for self-knowledge as well. This or that has a masculine feature or trait.  This or that has a feminine trait.  And this teaches us about who we are as a man or as a woman.  Thus naming things as masculine or feminine then help to form future generations as men and women.
  6. Salvation is the liberation of the fertility of creation by ordering it with the right finality, hence getting the right mediators of finality in place.   It is a movement of light (finality) over unformed fertility (the deep, waters) bringing out formed fertility (earth).  There seems to be a repeat in this unfolding in which days four to six are expansions on days one to three. It points to how the repetition of the principles of generativity (finality and fertility) expand into ever higher levels of creation.
    1. Day One – Light that separates day and night
    2. Day two – Waters are separated by firmament
    3. Day three – Earth appears, plants grow
    4. Day four – Two lights are created
    5. Day Five – Water creatures and birds grow
    6. Day six – Earth gives rise to animals and man

A Father’s Intent to Give

One of the drives of every authentic father is to bequeath to his children an inheritance just as it is a drive for every authentic mother to have her children in her loving home.  For the father, that inheritance is the loving home.  Thus God the Father wants us to have a living and loving home in His own heart where He resides with His Son and their Holy Spirit.  He brought Mary our mother there to make for all of us her loving home. This is the inheritance which He our Father gives to His sons and daughters who have faith in Him our Brother who died for them and who live in His bride, the Holy Catholic Church.

Genesis 1:3-5: The First Day

“And God said, “Let there be light and there was light. And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.  And there was evening and there was morning, one day.”

Saint Augustine in his literal commentary on Genesis thinks this light refers to the angels.  God is sharing His mind with them, His mind about creation and about man.  The darkness refers to those angels who turn against their loving Creator. Lux (light) in Hebrew is masculine.  Light illumines others, it shows them the way, it shows them what things should be and what they are.  This is a masculine character which comes out in the intense thirst for truth in authentic men. 

Philosophical and Theological Exposition

This light in the material order is the energy that is intrinsic to a potency, moves a potency to intelligibility in act.  Once this awakens in the conscious order, it becomes in men and women the light of intelligibility, of being, of conscience, of faith, and in the afterlife, of Glory for those who are gifted to receive the divine Light.  Physical light as Aristotle notes is the closest to spiritual agency, and this is why it becomes the analog for spiritual illumination.  Human wonder is this light.  It is spiritual energy. Both men and women share in it, but men are disposed to move it through lengthy difficulties that lead to insight, or lengthy accumulations of evidence that move toward reflective insight (see Lonergan’s Insight for more on reflective insight), and thus toward judgment and hence truth.  That drive toward the spiritual operations of understanding and judgment requires strength and perseverance and through such perseverance one builds a landscape of understanding and judgment, which then attunes one to a horizon of beings, and the interrelations of beings, and it discovers their lower and higher orders that constitute a hierarchy of creation.  This male disposition is what then builds an entire fund of knowledge and value that is passed on from one generation to the next.

One must remember that light is not merely for itself, but it seeks to illumine. Of course physical light does not need to illumine. When one shines a flashlight into the sky and there is nothing for it to illumine, one cannot really see the light. It seems like it is nothing. Only when an object falls into the path of the light does the light then illumine. In a similar fashion, the light of the mind seeks to find intelligibility in understanding and actuality in judgment.  To state this somewhat poetically or descriptively, that which receives the light as a seed and is illumined by the light into a flower of understanding and truth, and shows off her meaning and beauty is the feminine element of the cosmos. And thus, light seeks to bring out the glory of the feminine. He is about her. And when the light of understanding and truth shines upon the authentic woman, then understanding and truth grow into a cedar of Lebanon.

Genesis 1:1 In the Beginning…

 [As with all of these commentaries, any errors are mine and may I be forgiven if these deceive anyone.  Any truths are due to God.  May He be glorified for ever!]

“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and the darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the waters.”

Face (panim) is mentioned 2100 times in the old testament.  It can refer to God, animals, water, human beings, and the earth.  Sometimes, the word “eye” is used to translate face, so one might see “eye of the earth.”  Sometimes nose is used as well – “fall of the nose” or “bowing the nose” or “sweat of the nose.”  

Panim (face) is a masculine term in Hebrew.   In these commentaries, I will at times give attention to the masculine and feminine traits of words.  These of course do not tell us everything, but the gender of a word is quite important.  Hebrew words are almost always male and female (maybe always — this is just my observation).  This means that in the Hebrew horizon, the world is filled with the male and the female traits.  In other places (lonergan.org), I have argued that in evolutionary theory, one discerns some metaphysical foundations to male and female, namely that the male is linked to the finality of potencies, and female is linked to the fertilities of potencies.  This means that male and female are appropriately analogs for opening one’s eyes to the fertility of being no matter what kind of emergent being or developing being were are examining.  Quite interesting really.  Male and female words thus have become clear to me as pointers to the metaphysical facets of the creativity of being and the cosmos.  So, I will be highlighting these traits every so often.

Panim as masculine is linked to finality because it regards the potency of some being as “facing” somewhere, and looking for a destiny.  This basically is finality. The face of the waters thus are facing to become something, and the Spirit is what will awaken this existence.  The “deep” that has a face is feminine, as well be the earth that rises out of the deep.  The deep as feminine is like a womb of being and life. Creatures live in the deep, and it is like their womb.  The same is true of the earth, in which seeds are planted and then born to blossom and bear fruit.  This feminine “deep” is found in Babylonian mythology, and linked to a feminine goddess, Tiamat.  Marduk is the patron god of Babylon, a male, and his destruction of Tiamat creates the cosmos and establishes order out of, and against, her chaos.  Tiamat’s body was split in two to create the firmament and the bedrock of earth.  Coming-to-be is violent in that Babylonian world, and this is placed in stark contrast with the account of creation in Genesis — where all that is created is good.  And it is in stark contrast to the cause of disorder and order.

This makes me think of the demons who mediate a finality of death and destructive chaos.  It is the males who are the cause of the disorder.  It is the male principle that has to get rightly ordered first.  Sin needs to be cast back into the deep, and Israel’s conquering of the promised land also rids the land of sin so that it might become more fruitful and salvific as a homeland.  The Exodus becomes God’s salvation from the chaos of the deep. Psalm 77 beautifully describes this.  That rightly ordering of the male principle then allows for the beauty of the feminine to bear forth all that is good.  The death and destruction of the feminine is not the way forward, but rather the liberation of the feminine as fertility is the way forward to transcending fruitfulness.

One way to think of this is that the fallen angels enslaved the authentic fertility of the whole order of the material cosmos.  God’s Spirit then frees the woman — the fertile one — from this enslavement. And then she is able to give birth to good creatures, and eventual to man, and even to the Son.  

As well in scripture, the deep is linked to Rahab (Is 5 — similar to Tiamat), Leviatan, rivers, seas, Tannin (monster of the deep, serpents), mighty waters, draggons, beasts who are crouching down under.  The redeemed are redeemed from and through the deep, they have to pass through it.  It is also linked to tame waters, life giving waters, waters that flow from God’s abode in Jerusalem (Ps 46), the rock of the Temple in Jewish tradition was built at the mouth of Tehom.  This restless deep was tamed at the defeat of watery monsters (Ps 74).  It is linked as well to the Garden of God, the unending waters of the deep are “harnessed for good.”  This deep provides life-giving waters to Israelites in the wilderness (Ps 78).  The wicked are cast into the deep (Jonah 2). Darkness abides in the deep (Ps 88).  It is the realm of the dead (Job 38).  It is the opposite of heaven (Gn 49, Dt 33, Ps 107).  One sees a link between the abyss and the realm of the dead in Rom 10.  It is an imprisonment of the wicked spirits (Lk 8, Rev 9, Rev 11, Rev 17, and Rev 20).  

More philosophically, the deep is metaphysical like prime matter, which can be deformed or unformed.  As deformed it is chaos and the home of the wicked, a home that chases after the living and always captures the living.  It thus becomes the abode of the dead.  

So one could read this passage as God creating both the angels and all of the material order together, as one finds in later tradition. As created together, the angels were made complete and at the moment of their creation they made a choice to either stay with God or they rebelled.  If it is true that angels, at least some, also order the laws and ways of the material world, then the fallen angels would be disordering that material world. It seems that Satan must of had such a rule, which is why we are enslaved to him until Jesus came.  However, we were not enslaved at the time of the creation of man, even though, presumably, Satan was already fallen, and perhaps had warped the material order.  Maybe at first, the material order was so warped that God had to breath His Spirit over it so that it could bear fruit.  Or maybe Augustine is right, that the deep, or abyss, is the nothingness from which we came (in itself thus neither ordered or disordered). But why name the nothingness “the deep” — though symbolically nothingness could be called that.  Much of the later symbolism of the “deep” does seem to point to something, and many times that something is deformed.   Nothing is not deformed, because no-thing, shear absence of being, can not be deformed.  Interestingly, as feminine, this abyss, this deep, as deformed, thus bears forth disorder if not rightly ordered.  And it was disordered by fallen angels, who are masculine.  Just some thoughts to kick off this commentary.

 

 

Initial Thoughts on Genesis 1:1

Thoughts on Genesis 1:1

“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.  The earth was without form and void, and the darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the waters.”

The “deep” here is feminine in the various languages as is its other translation “abyss.”  It is related to the goddess Tiamat in Babylonian mythology in the sense that she is the god of this kind of deep and abyss.  And the spirit will bring order over this abyss.  

The deep introduces into one’s imagination the demons who mediate a finality of death and destructive chaos.  Sin returns one to the deep.  It seems to point to a disordered tendency within the depths of the universe, and thus one wonders if demons and satan are the real destructive dynamism of this tendency.  When it then rises into the human soul, it is concupiscence. 

However, in the created order itself, its natural propensity is toward increasing intelligibility, being, and goodness.  Thus it should natural rise up into life and good order.  

This is the beginning of salvation history.  The fallen angels are the great source of the fall of the human race.  They have deformed the good order of all material creation so that it to needs to be made into a new earth.  The earth is a feminine word as is the deep (the heavens are masculine by the way).  She should be fertile.  She should be the rich soil from which all else rises up. The deep should be as well.  And when this awakens into the human heart it starts not as a fallen will, but as a man and woman rightly ordered in a garden that God had to set apart within the world.  And so they had to be tempted inside and out.  Pride and envy inside.  A serpent out.  In a fashion, it was the anti-masculine, anti-finality, that was at work.  Finality regards the movement of potency to act.  But this was not to act.  And finality always operates within a fertile field, and it operates to enhance and protect the fertility of that field so that more life will rise up.  But in this case, the anti-finality works to make the fertile field less fertile.  It works to deform the abyss, the deep, the earth, the woman, so that she is not fertile, first in obedience to God, and then to the one who is suppose to love her, and then to her own children, and the rest of creation. And of the man, it works to deform him so that he become one who no longer moves a potency to act, no longer seeks to protect and enhance fertility, but rather brings on death.

So just as the Spirit breaths over the waters to create, so the Spirit has to breath over the fallen earth and fallen man to recreate a new earth and a new man.  And with a new man, will come a new gift from man’s side  while that man hangs on the cross.  Just as the rib came from man’s side to build a woman, so now his spilled blood and water will build a new woman who will give birth to a new earth that will ascend into a new heaven.

Thoughts on Eve

David John

Have you ever noticed what and when Eve in the book of Genesis says something? There is her exchange with the serpent (Gn 3: 2-3) Adam (Gn 3:6 – though no words are recorded)  and God (Gn 3:13).  But I took interest in what she says after the birth of her sons, or what she does not say.  With Cain, she says, “I have gotten a man with the help of the Lord.” (Gn 4:1) With Abel, she says, well, nothing. With Seth, she says, “God has appointed for me another child instead of Abel, for Cain slew him.”

In the various languages, the “gotten” in Gn 4:1 basically seems to get at the meaning. It is a kind of purchasing or acquisition.  It suggests a kind of accomplishment that results in an ownership.  In any case, it seems to suggest that Eve was the central figure in acquiring Cain, and God was her helper.  We have to remember that Eve was in a fallen state at this point, as was Adam. So why would she see Cain this way?

Let me provide one possibility. The male disposition tends to see things as acquisitions, especially in the fallen state, and so one wonders if this rubbed off on Eve.  Eve was his treasure. And in her fall, she desired her man and he “will lord if over her.”  This suggests among many other things that she will take on his disposition, even if it is against her own. That is how he “lords if over her.”  Her own natural disposition would be to embrace and treasure this child that grew in her body as a gift. But she did not.  And so one could think that with Cain, she saw him like Adam might have seen him, as an acquisition.  An object really.  Not as a gift in the image of God and wholly from God.  

With Abel, nothing is recorded from Eve. Of course, we know that much must have been said.  But why the silence in scripture? Abel was the second child.  Maybe in her fallen state, Eve was underwhelmed after being overwhelmed with her first acquisition. Cain probably became a bit spoiled, demanding, expecting.  And so her first acquisition was perhaps something that reduced her spiritedness about life.  And so Abel comes along and she was certainly happy, but this one was not seen as a welcome acquisition. At the same time, Abel likely was not seen as a gift from the Lord either, a gift in His image.  And so nothing worthy was said, hence nothing was recorded.  

But then Cain kills Abel.  Cain’s disordered desires rise up. Likely he had failed since he was a child to recognize the glory and honor due to his loving God, his Creator.  His spiritual state made it impossible for him to make a right offering to the Lord.  And this comes out in his response to God’s response to his offering. The Lord rejected his offering. And Cain did not respond with humility and contrition. Instead, he became angry. At who?  God his Creator!  All of this would have been the spirit that he inherited from his mother and perhaps from his father.  He was first hers, then God’s.  and so she passed on to her acquisition that God was second.  He, like his mother, should be the determiner of right and wrong. Who is God to say what is a good offering?  

Of course, he is not capable of murdering God because God was not yet man.  And of course, God cannot be murdered. But, here was Abel, the righteous one. One could imagine Abel being less than treasured as a son. He should have been treasured as a child in the image of God.  But after Cain, likely he was not. And so he suffered.  He must have turned to his Creator in that suffering, and his Creator turned to him as a loving Father and embraced him.  So, when Abel gave from his flock, it was welcomed with open arms. 

Cain was not so open in his arms. Out of his anger toward God, he then turned to this mortal son of God and killed him. It was the next best thing. Cain who could not kill God killed God’s loved one.  And Abel’s blood is drunk by the ground and even the ground turns against Cain.

Now back to Eve.  Her suffering in this must have been great.  She would have seen the corruption in the heart and soul of her son Cain.  She probably also came to see her role in this.  And thus her role in the death of Abel.  And in this suffering, she comes to a deeper understanding of who she is as a mother, and a deeper understanding and love for her children.  It would have been in her natural disposition as a mother to love her children as a gift.  And so, this suffering awoke this natural disposition.  And likely, her tears also awoke that same love in Adam, and through her, he came to see the gift of his own children in a deeper way, as a gift from his loving Creator.

Then Adam and Eve get to see the unfolding vengence springing from the soul of Cain into Cain’s own children and grandchildren. It grows until it is seventy-sevenfold in Lamech. 

And so with this unfolding sorrow comes a deeper understanding and love for his wife and their children.  Perhaps this is the deeper layer of meaning that led Adam to “know her again” as bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh.  After the fall, he likely could only see her in lust.  Suffering opened the doors to so that he could rejoice in her once again. 

And Seth is born. He is given to her from the Lord and she now sees the greater depth of this little gift. She recognizes the degree to which this little child is first and foremost from God.  The Greek Septuagint uses the word “resurrected” rather than appointed. It even moreso suggests God’s magnificent generosity and that Eve in proclaiming this, now recognizes it in her mind and heart.  And of course, this pre-figures the resurrection of Jesus, and of all of us.  

My point, is this seems to be a moment in which God brought Eve through suffering from a deformed relationship to her children into one that was more authentic and right.  Now, for the first time, she could be an authentic mother. 

These of course are some speculations, but there really is a recorded difference in Eve’s words spoken in response to the birth of Cain and those spoken in response to the birth of Seth.  And nothing in scripture is without meaning.  If what I propose is true, how glorious is God in his correction and healing of our souls.  And this would then be true from the very start, with his first son and daughter. He was raising them spiritually from the dead.

This story tells us a great deal about being a man and a woman and how God redeems us.

Transgender Identity

As with many of the challenges to the Catholic faith, transgender ideology is one that is particularly pointed.  It reaches deep into the vacuums that have arisen within family life and introduces much confusion.  I would like to give attention not so much to the transgender ideology, but to its ability to have such an impact. 

When something is strong inside, nothing outside can shake it.  So, if transgender ideology is shaking family life, and children, then it is because there has arisen a weakness.  I would affirm that weakness to be a failure of both mothers and fathers to understand their own identities, to live out those identities, and to transmit those identities to their children.  This has created a spiritual vacuum which makes family life vulnerable to many deformations, one of which is the gender problem.  

Such vulnerable is found throughout history.  Cicero and Augustine both argue that if an civic order has lost its moral courage, its just order, its dedication to the common good, then it will be defeated by barbarian invaders or implode on its own self-destruction.  One can see the same effects throughout history.  The weakening of Christendom opened the doors for nationalism to begin to rule the day.  The weakening of Europe with that rise of nationalism, opened the door to various totalitarian ideologies such as communism and Nazism.  One sees the same patterns both in families and in individuals.  When an individual has become unstable, they can easily become manipulated by others to join this or that fad or cult.  They easily succumb to depression or they become violent.  Family life when the father no longer pays attention, cares about the good of his wife and children, and sloths off into some chair or world of his own, then it leaves doors open to any corruptive forces. And there are plenty.  Likewise, when a mother abandons her loved ones to be care and nurtured by another, then it leaves them open to a multitude of deformed pleasures.  The father moves the family to the good, sometimes with fear, and always with command.  The mother opens the good so that it resides deeply in the heart.  Without both living out their identities in relationship with each, the vacuum left for all incoming fads ad ideas is great.  It sucks them into the heart, and then it bursts forth into hatred and chaos.